When
the Chicago Park District announced in January its plans for
retooling Promontory Point-the landscaped peninsula that juts
into Lake Michigan just north of the Museum of Science and
Industry-local residents were outraged. Chicago newspapers
ran ominous headlines like "Storm Brewing Over Point"
and "Residents Threaten 'War' Over Park Site."
The
$22 million project-part of a $35 million effort by the Park
District and the Army Corps of Engineers to rebuild eight
miles of Chicago's lakefront -provoked the community's anger
for a number of reasons focused around two central themes.
First, the community's input over the previous year of planning
had been all but ignored. Second, the project to replace the
deteriorating revetments that hold back Lake Michigan was,
they felt, over-engineered, incorporating larger and more
industrial-looking structures than were necessary.
The
Park District had proposed closing the Point for two years
to replace the deteriorating limestone blocks that descend
like steps into Lake Michigan with a concrete revetment significantly
higher than the average water level-making entering and exiting
the water difficult-and constructing two soccer-field-sized
drainage gaps, one on either side of the peninsula, to handle
water overflow.
All
of these steps were necessary, insisted Park District representative
Bridget Gainer Kirby, citing low water levels during the past
30 years as the culprit, damaging the wood pilings that hold
the limestone boulders in place and keep the shoreline from
eroding. Without the proposed concrete revetment, Kirby said,
the Point would be swallowed by the lake.
But
residents did not want their beloved landmark to become what
Hyde Park Historical Society President Alice Schlessinger
called "an ugly construction that looks like an industrial
harbor or a military installation." After the January
meeting, a community task force was formed to examine the
Park District's plans, to suggest changes to the project,
and if its complaints went unanswered, to find other ways
of stopping the construction.
"There
will be a storm of protests here," warned de facto spokesman
Peter Rossi after the task force was formed. "We will
try to block the construction by any means necessary. It will
be impossible for [the city] to build this thing without making
concessions."
In
March, Rossi, MBA'80, PhD'84, the Joseph T. Lewis professor
of marketing and statistics in the Graduate School of Business,
created a comprehensive Web page (gsb-www.uchicago.edu/
fac/peter.rossi/more/Community_Point.htm) outlining
the Park District's proposal as well as the task force's suggested
changes. "The Park District is taking the same design
they use everywhere and wrapping it around the Point and providing
no water access whatsoever," said Rossi in mid-April
while the city was reviewing the task force's suggestions.
"Our view is that that would irreparably destroy the
Point as a recreational place and as a thing of beauty."
The
controversy brought Chicago students and local residents together
in a battle over common ground. Annika Weckerle, a third-year
economics concentrator, visits the Point at least once a week
to run, study, or hang out with friends. "If you go there
late at night after it closes, people spring up like mold,"
she says. "It is not limited to U of C students. It's
a place for the whole community."
The
Point is a familiar feature to any Hyde Parker who's ever
walked through the 55th Street pedestrian underpass and emerged
on the other side to find a Prairie School-style field house
resting on a meadow of lush green grass. Part of Daniel Burnham's
1909 plan of Chicago, the Point was developed in the 1920s
and landscaped in 1937 by Alfred Caldwell, a noted architect
and professor at the Illinois Institute of Technology. What
makes the Point special, say the residents who frequent it,
is its continuous edge of stratified limestone, allowing them
to walk right down into the lake. Although swimming isn't
officially allowed, the rule is often ignored, and summer
days are witness to swimmers, kayakers, windsurfers, and people
who sit on the edge and dangle their feet in the waves.
Access
to the water was one of the central concerns of the task force-"a
dealbreaker," as Rossi put it. Residents also requested
that the new steps be made of or clad in limestone to preserve
the current aesthetics, and that the revetment be lowered
or the bike path that runs through the Point raised to maintain
the current view of the lake. With the help of Fifth Ward
Alderman Leslie Hairston, the task force gained concessions
from the Park District over the course of discussions in March
and April-such as an agreement to keep as much of the Point
as possible open during construction-but was still adamant
about issues such as water access and aesthetics.
After
months of uncertainty, almost 200 Hyde Parkers gathered May
2 at the Oriental Institute to hear Park District Superintendent
David Doig and City Environmental Commissioner Bill Abolt
put forth a revised proposal that incorporated many of the
residents' suggestions.
The
Point's revetment will now be rebuilt in two phases: the north
half will be closed for construction starting this fall through
2002 and then reopened when the south half undergoes construction
in 2003. The original limestone will be reused to build two
300-foot stretches of steps leading into the water, much like
the current steps, while the rest of the revetment will be
constructed in textured concrete to give it the appearance
of natural stone. The remaining limestone will be used to
construct "toe berms"-steps that rest just below
the water's surface-all the way around the peninsula so residents
can more easily climb into the lake from any point along the
revetment.
In response to concerns that the project had been over-engineered,
the Park District lowered the revetment wall and reduced the
size of the drainage gaps by as much as 75 percent. The revised
plans also call for raising the bike path to ensure an unhampered
view of the lake.
One
change that was not asked for was the setting aside of a designated
swimming area along the peninsula's southern edge. The area
will be marked by a line of buoys extending 150 feet into
the lake from the 57th Street beach to the east end of the
Point. Lifeguards will be posted along the south shore during
the summer to monitor the designated area. Although lifeguards
have been posted along the Point before to respond to emergencies,
this is the first time the Park District will officially allow
swimming there.
For
the most part the task force is satisfied with the concessions,
even though the unavoidable use of concrete will make the
Point look less natural than it does now. Rossi is cautiously
optimistic: "We got what we asked for, and we got it
in writing," he says. "But now we have to turn to
implementation. This will not be over until the construction
is finished."-C.S.