The University of Chicago Magazine
The son of a general internist, John Lantos is a physician who's married to a fellow U of C pediatrician. Part of the task force that worked on the Clintons' ill-fated health-reform plan, Lantos also specializes in medical ethics. He's just written a book that asks a leading question: "Do we still need doctors?" His answer begins this way....
By John Lantos
Photos by Dan Dry
Perhaps that's as it should be. It's difficult to argue that it is more important to tell the stories of people with AIDS than to try to find a cure. But such an emphasis changes what we think and expect of doctors, and it changes how doctors think about themselves and their aspirations. It leads to a focus on measurable outcomes, on predictable interventions.
The problem is that much malaise does not fit into the model. In some cases, illnesses--arthritis; lower back pain; Huntington's, Hurler's, or Alzheimer's disease--are poorly understood and their treatments largely ineffective. In other cases, people simply don't behave the way the models would have them behave.
And there's a paradox: No matter how much medical progress we make, the net amount of disease and suffering doesn't decrease. There is no closure, no logical conclusion to the enterprise. Instead,
John D. Lantos is associate professor of pediatrics at the University of Chicago, where he is also associate director of the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics. A graduate of Brown University and the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Lantos is the author of Do We Still Need Doctors?, to be published by Routledge in April.
Return to February 1997 Table of Contents