IMAGE:  Issue graphic
LINK:  Also in every issue
Editor's Notes  
From the President  
LINK:  Features
The interpretation of the gods  
Executive Order  
China Reach  
Spy guy  

LINK:  Class Notes
Peer Review  
In their own words  

LINK:  Campus News
Chicago Journal  
University News e-bulletin  

LINK:  Research
Research at Chicago  
GRAPHIC:  University of Chicago Magazine

GRAPHIC:  Also in every issueLetters
...why not boast about Leopold and Loeb?

I was impressed at the Wall Street Journalized image of Don M. Randel in the October/04 issue (“From the President”). It made the sense of his remarks tellingly visual. I was impressed, too, that he wrote that ideas matter.

As a run-of-the-mill alumnus, I am somewhat dismayed to find the University and the Magazine tending to avoid the embarrassing fact that ideas matter—as do actions. Instead, we are treated to exaltation of the business school. We get quasi-meaningful references to alumni important enough to be featured in Fahrenheit 9/11.

The idea that Mr. Randel fails to remember is that economics and business, as taught at our University, have turned into a kind of fundamentalism. When I was a student in the 1970s, Chile and the Chicago Boys experiment were highly controversial. Now, some 30 years later, Chile is still a deeply scarred country, and the important people have all moved on to other things, like democratizing Iraq through unbridled free-market capitalism and mutual back-scratching for dollars.

Another idea that Mr. Randel fails to remember is that those who received a liberal education, as I did, are expected to return good for the good they received. I studied Western civilization under Mr. Weintraub—a stateless man persecuted as a Jew, and a former refugee—and I understand that civilization is a delicate creation, that a liberal education should make us highly skeptical of those who seek and wield power. (Isn’t that the sense of the lecture that you so recently published after his death?) Instead, we are treated to role models from our University such as these famous democratizers: Prudish Attorney General Ashcroft. Conflict-of-interest-ridden Justice Scalia [who taught at the Law School from 1977 to 1982—Ed.], who would rather be off pontificating, and shooting ducks and pheasants. Remote-control general Wolfowitz, nonchalantly corrupting the Republic with his bad dream of empire. Yet, on page 22 of the same issue (“On the Quads”), we find the results of their actions in Deborah Umannabuike, deported and faced with financial ruin at the age of 20. Surely she wasn’t damaging our national security, was she?

And surely the ideas on economics and the law that have emerged from the crucible of the red-hot debates at our university couldn’t have led to such real-world misery! (Or is it time for our trusty assistants here at the University of Laputa to tap us on the heads with bladders?)

So, yes, ideas matter, and actions mat-ter, and so do things that we see, like that WSJ–style portrait of Mr. Randel. I suggest that Mr. Randel use the space instead to explain how he plans to drive out some of the bad ideas (the illiberal ideas) of the philosopher-kings and economist-kings. Isn’t that how the “marketplace of ideas” is meant to work? Or is it malfunctioning again?

Donald J. Gecewicz, AB’76

The University of Chicago Magazine welcomes letters. Letters for publication must be signed and may be edited for space and clarity. To ensure the widest range of views, we encourage letters of fewer than 300 words. Write: Editor, University of Chicago Magazine, 5801 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL60637. Or e-mail:


2007 The University of Chicago® Magazine | 401 North Michigan Ave. Suite 1000, Chicago, IL 60611
phone: 773/702-2163 | fax: 773/702-8836 |