image: University of Chicago Magazine - logo

link to: featureslink to: class news, books, deathslink to: chicago journal, college reportlink to: investigationslink to: editor's notes, letters, chicagophile, course work
link to: back issueslink to: contact forms, address updateslink to: staff info, ad rates, subscriptions


  DEPARTMENTS
  > > Editor's Note
  > >
Letters
  > >
Chicagophile
  > > e-Bulletin: 08/02/02


LETTERS
Thesis offered


I was tremendously struck by the observation ("Letters," June/02) by another College Class of 1969 graduate that few of us send in class notices or announce books published, and that perhaps this was related to the turbulent events of 1969. She suggests, "There's a doctoral study in this, somewhere." I would like to make a small contribution to that study.

In 1999 a University of Chicago professor sent me a copy of a study by the University looking back at the events 30 years earlier. The description of the sit-in of February 1969, from the point of view of the administration in 1999, chilled my blood. After all these years I still feel anger and a terrible sense of waste when I think back to that time and the people I knew who were suspended or expelled. In my own life the way the University treated the students, refusing to let them defend themselves collectively but condemning them in secret hearings for the collective actions of hundreds of other people, had a huge and lasting effect.

I was a senior, and it was a shocking violation of all the Platonic ideals I had been taught for four years. When I saw the philosophy professors I had most admired lie, with or without compunction, I realized that all their knowledge of civilization and the classics had not shown them how to practice justice or share the life of the mind. I counted up my courses and managed to graduate in March.

It is unlikely that the administrators learned much from that time if the report reflects history as they see it. During the sit-in, one of the professors' big arguments against student power was, "We are here for the long term. You're just passing through for four years."

Ironically, the impact of the University's dishonorable behavior has been far greater on me, who passed through and had to integrate everything I saw into my developing world view, than on the administrators, who seem to be thinking-just as the faculty did in 1969-that agonizing is just as good as acting morally. If that is the life of the mind, I thought, count me out. Fortunately today I know that it is not, but it took me decades to recover any ability to take philosophy seriously.

And I am still unable to contribute to Chicago.

Nancy E. Abrams, AB'69
Santa Cruz, California


 


  AUGUST 2002

  > > Volume 94, Number 6


  FEATURES
  > >
Teachable moments
  > > Off-key smash
  > >
Great men of Great Books
  > >
Business of Reflection


  CLASS NOTES
  > > Class News

  > > Books
  > > Deaths

  CAMPUS NEWS
  > > Chicago Journal

  > > University News

  RESEARCH
  > > Investigations


  ARCHIVES
  CONTACT
  ABOUT THE MAGAZINE
  SEARCH/SITE MAP

  ALUMNI GATEWAY
  ALUMNI DIRECTORY
  THE UNIVERSITY

uchicago ©2002 The University of Chicago Magazine 1313 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637
phone: 773/702-2163 fax: 773/702-2166 uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu