IMAGE:  December 2003
 
LINK:  Also in every issue
Editor's Notes  
From the President  
Letters  
Chicagophile  
 
LINK:  Features
Zone of contention  
Life of the body  
Immersion theory  
Standing guard
Low pitch, high demand  

Baby pictures

 

LINK:  Class Notes
Alumni News  
Alumni Works  
Deaths  

LINK:  Campus News
Chicago Journal  
University News  
Uchicago.edu e-bulletin  

LINK:  Research
Investigations  
Coursework  
Citations  
Research at Chicago  
 
GRAPHIC:  University of Chicago Magazine
 
 
DECEMBER 2003
Volume 96, Issue 2
 

GRAPHIC:  Also in every issueLETTERS
Upon what meat have you fed that you can…

Law & education

I was sufficiently charmed by the sociologist Andrew Abbott’s “Aims of Education” address to tape on my office door the excerpt explaining why a good education is useless to most lawyers. After a few days, however, I decided that he had overstated the case. In my own practice, which centers on trial-level constitutional litigation, I often draw on analytic skills, which at least seem directly related to my undergraduate education in, for instance, mastering enough detail about “bivariate ecological regression” to cross-examine experts on the topic; working with historians and even sociologists to present a persuasive picture of complex topics to a court or jury; and, more broadly, cutting through fairly complicated hogwash and sophistry to articulate the “correct” side of the argument. On introspection, the more free-wheeling methods of inquiry and argumentation that often come into play in this aspect of the job seem more like what is experienced in college than like the dry, issue-spot-by-the-numbers approach of law school.

Perhaps this means that I’m just a glorified peon, rather than Abbott’s ideal of the smooth if uncomplicated, elite rainmaker. Admittedly, there appear to be plenty of uninteresting, uninterested people at every level of the legal profession, from silk to polyester. But I do think that, at least in certain niches of lawyering, one can benefit from thinking broadly, deeply, and creatively in a way not wholly unlike what one experienced in the College.

Andrew S. Mine, AB’81
Chicago


The University of Chicago Magazine welcomes letters on its contents or on topics related to the University. Letters must be signed and may be edited for space and clarity. We ask readers to keep correspondence to 300 words or less. Write:

Editor, University of Chicago Magazine,
5801 S. Ellis Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637

E-mail: uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu


 


Google
Search WWW Search magazine.uchicago.edu

Contact Advertising About the Magazine Alumni UChicago Views Archives
uchicago 2003 The University of Chicago Magazine 5801 South Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637
phone: 773/702-2163 fax: 773/702-0495 uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu