|  COURSEWORK
  Is there a plot in this 
              plat?   Students in Kathleen N. 
              Conzen’s urban-history colloquium take a questioning look 
              at the old neighborhood. 
               
                |  |   
                | Syllabus  There are no prerequisites 
                    for enrolling in Colloquium: Chicago and the South Side, says 
                    historian Kathleen N. Conzen, “other than a curiosity 
                    about how cities developed and a willingness to ask questions 
                    and probe for answers.” Conzen has designed the course 
                    to introduce students to the history of American cities in 
                    the 19th and 20th centuries by exploring one city and some 
                    of its neighborhoods. This fall the colloquium focused on 
                    the relationship between the University of Chicago and its 
                    neighborhood, and readings were chosen to orient students 
                    to the development of the University, the city, and its South 
                    Side neighborhoods: Chicago: The Growth of a Metropolis 
                    (University of Chicago Press, 1969), City of Big Shoulders: 
                    A History of Chicago (Northern Illinois University Press, 
                    2000), and Hyde Park, Illinois (Arcadia, 2001). Conzen also arranged 
                    a series of practica, including sessions with Library staffers 
                    on using archival resources, compiling bibliographies, and 
                    interpreting maps. Another practicum experience asked students 
                    to “[s]elect almost at random any two July runs of a 
                    Chicago newspaper in the Regenstein microfilm collection, 
                    separated from one another by 20 years, for any time span 
                    up to 1975, and skim them quickly. What strikes you about 
                    life in the city as reported by the newspaper during these 
                    time periods? What kinds of changes over time do you note? 
                    What questions do they raise for you?” The final text—Richard 
                    Marius and Melvin Page’s A Short Guide to Writing 
                    about History—pointed to the capstone assignment, 
                    presenting and defending a 15-page original research paper. 
                    True to the give-and-take of a colloquium, each student also 
                    had a parallel task: “responsibly critiquing” 
                    a classmate’s work.—M.R.Y. |  History 296, Colloquium: Chicago and the South 
              Side, meets in JRL 130, a windowless seminar room in the Special 
              Collections wing of the Joseph Regenstein Library. The room assignment 
              makes logistical sense. One goal of Kathleen Neils Conzen’s 
              course is to “introduce students to the methods and sources 
              of historical research.” Proximity to the Reg’s resources 
              means that field trips—to the University archives, for example—are 
              quick commutes. Students also have a quick commute to the colloquium’s 
              topic: the relationship between the University and the neighborhood 
              and city in which it is located. In using Hyde Park and the South Side as a case 
              study to introduce issues and methodologies in the history and historical 
              geography of American urban life, Conzen teaches close to her own 
              specialty, 19th-century U.S. social and political history. With 
              a Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin–Madison, she is the 
              author of Immigrant Milwaukee, 1836–1860: Accommodation 
              and Community in a Frontier City (Harvard, 1976). Completing 
              a book on 19th-century German-American efforts to develop and defend 
              a theory of pluralistic democratic nationalism, Conzen, a 1995 Quantrell 
              Award winner for excellence in undergraduate teaching who chairs 
              the Department of History, is also finishing up a book on German 
              peasant settlement in the frontier Midwest.   On a Tuesday afternoon in late October, Week 
              5 of the quarter, students enter the seminar room, conversing in 
              low, library tones as they take seats and pull out the day’s 
              assigned reading, paper, and pencils (Special Collections is an 
              ink-free zone). Conzen arrives in shades of black and gray and reminds 
              the class that the day’s agenda, Urban History in Microcosm: 
              A University and Its Neighborhood, has been altered to include Week 
              4’s practicum, Interpreting Maps and Other Visual Sources. 
             Waiting for a few stragglers, Conzen makes light 
              conversation with the students already in their places: “I 
              hope you all have been starting to have some adventures in the archives.” 
              Then they set off for the third floor.  Minutes later Christopher Winters, the Library’s 
              bibliographer for anthropology, geography, and maps, stands before 
              a worktable covered with colorful charts—a small sampling 
              of the 400,000 maps, 10,000 air photos, and 2,000 books that make 
              Chicago’s one of the largest university map libraries in North 
              America. Winters is recovering from a cold, but his hoarse voice 
              lilts with enthusiasm as he displays samples of the collection’s 
              wares.  First up is a 2003 Rand McNally map of Chicago. 
              “These are in some ways just awful from a scholarly point 
              of view,” he says, noting for example that “there’s 
              a Veterans’ Hospital in my neighborhood that was torn down 
              25 years ago—it’s still on the map.” Next comes 
              a 1957 map of the Chicago area distributed by Phillips 66, with 
              the firm’s orange-and-black logo prominently placed. “No 
              public transportation routes are noted,” he explains, “because 
              gas companies couldn’t care less.” Picking up another 
              sheet, he encourages the students ringing the table to examine more 
              closely the one he’s just put down: “Maps are meant 
              to be looked at.”  For the next half-hour the group does just that, 
              seeing Chicago charted and recharted. Topographic maps, air photos 
              from the 1930s, 19th-century fire-insurance maps with structures 
              color-coded pink, blue, green, or brown to show the building materials 
              used, plat maps marking property boundaries. “Some of you 
              are going to work on urban renewal,” Winters says, introducing 
              the collection’s holdings in that area, including Chicago’s 
              1946 comprehensive city plan, with its “freeway on the West 
              Side that never got built,” and maps from the 1960s urban-renewal 
              period with housing projects delineated in somber reds and browns. 
              He calls up a 1990 land-use map on the monitor behind him: “You 
              can customize it any way you want—up to a point,” noting 
              that the basic tract files can be overlaid with one’s own 
              research. “Cool,” a guy in jeans responds, 
              seeming to speak for the group, and a flurry of nuts-and-bolts questions 
              and answers about downloading ensues. It’s on to thematic maps: tracking patterns 
              of ethnicity, land use, economic strata, transportation use. “Anything 
              that varies,” Winters tells the historical-geographers-in-training, 
              “can be mapped.”  Back in JRL 130 Conzen asks her students to introduce 
              themselves to a visitor, introductions that do double duty as quick 
              reports on the topics they’ve chosen for the course’s 
              capstone paper. Formal presentation and defense of a three- to four-page 
              research proposal, including research design and bibliography, are 
              due Week 7. Clockwise around the seminar table the ten men 
              and three women reel off their names and subjects. Some zoom in 
              on a building or event: Why did the Chicago Housing Authority place 
              the Cabrini Green housing development so close to the wealthy Gold 
              Coast? What role did civil rights and race issues play in the 1966 
              Douglas-Percy race for the U.S. Senate? Others soar out in a bird’s-eye 
              query: Will tracking the migration patterns of the city’s 
              Polish population over the last century show that immigrants from 
              specific regions congregated in certain Chicago neighborhoods?    Tracking at the tract level: Hyde 
              Park, correlated to 2000 census tracts in this online map, is a 
              well-off neighborhood with many (red) and very many (pink) non-family 
              households, situated in an area of (blue) very poor, female-headed 
              households.
 Several topics blend town and gown: How does 
              the history of Woodlawn’s First Presbyterian Church and its 
              agenda of social engagement relate to the history of the U of C? 
              How does the Shoreland’s shift from elite hotel to undergraduate 
              residence mirror the University’s relationship with the Hyde 
              Park neighborhood? Circle completed, Conzen signals a turn. “Moving 
              from the broad scale of the city of Chicago, and bringing it down 
              to Hyde Park,” she shifts to the day’s reading. Part 
              of Arcadia Publishing’s Images in America series, Hyde 
              Park, Illinois, by Max Grinnell, AB’98, AM’02, 
              is a selection of captioned photographs and drawings.  “Let’s start with a bit of general 
              reaction,” Conzen urges. With customary hesitancy, students 
              flip through pages, gathering thoughts. “It’s just letting 
              pictures tell the story,” comes the first venture from a young 
              man in a red and white long-sleeved T-shirt. “It’s basically 
              captions,” a guy across the table agrees. “Do the pictures tell you anything here?” 
              Conzen presses.  “They raise a lot of questions?” 
              one student tries. Another compares reading the book to “watching 
              a slide show.” Grinnell’s book is part of a series, Conzen 
              acknowledges, with a “fixed format—lots of pictures 
              and relatively small text, aimed at a popular audience. For all 
              of that, this book does have an argument, a thesis, a plot.” 
              In other words, she asks, “Is there a point that Grinnell 
              wants to make?” The discussion takes off as the class moves from 
              Grinnell’s perspective as a U of C student looking out at 
              the neighborhood to his definition of Hyde Park—from 51st 
              Street to just south of the Midway, from the lake to Drexel or Cottage 
              Grove. They note that he divides his history into three periods: 
              up until the 1893 World’s Fair, from the fair until the 1950s, 
              and the start of urban renewal—rise, decline, and rejuvenation. 
              For Grinnell, Conzen sums up, Hyde Park is the story “of the 
              University that built a neighborhood but then could have done more.” Again the scale shifts as Conzen asks students 
              to share observations from the week’s practicum assignment: 
              selecting a two-block area of Hyde Park and walking it slowly, “looking 
              carefully at everything you can. What does the physical evidence 
              suggest about the historical development and social character of 
              the area? What questions does it raise that you would like to have 
              answered through historical research?” Why so many high-rise apartment buildings along 
              Lake Shore Drive? one student wonders. How did Harper Avenue between 
              57th and 59th Streets acquire its liberal, close-knit aura? another 
              asks. An answer to the first question might have to do with evolving 
              lifestyles or improved transportation, Conzen suggests, while an 
              answer to the second might begin with Harper Avenue’s own 
              beginnings as a quasi-resort community on the city’s edge. 
             Time runs out before the observations do, but 
              the point is made: behind every block is a backstory—and a 
              multitude of routes to finding the plot.—M.R.Y. |  |