When 
                the Magazine 
                asked a group of Chicago faculty how they planned to spend their 
                summer, the answers had one constant: enthusiasm.
               Danielle 
                Allen, Classics
Danielle 
                Allen, Classics 
                Danielle Allen's summer schedule is full. An assistant professor 
                in classical languages & literatures and in the College, she's 
                back from delivering a paper in Berlin and about to start a four-week 
                stint teaching "Intro to Attic Greek 2", three hours a day, five 
                days a week. She's also juggling work on the final two chapters 
                of a book about rhetoric and democratic deliberation with the 
                editing of a video documentary on Iranian women poets and novelists. 
                But the feel is different, she says, because she's just finishing 
                up a year as a fellow at the Franke Institute for the Humanities. 
                
              
                 
                  |  | 
                 
                  | Danielle 
                    Allen, Classics | 
              
              "One 
                of the great advantages of having the year at the Franke Institute," 
                she says, "is that this year summer feels like a capping-off time." 
                With six chapters of Intricate Democracy: Hobbes, Ellison, 
                and Aristotle on Distrust, Rhetoric, and Civic Friendship firmly 
                drafted, the first draft of another chapter completed, and one 
                to go, she's "at that stage where the adrenaline kicks in, with 
                more ideas all the time."
               
                The book argues that the durability of democracy depends not only 
                on legislation and policy-making but also on the cultivation of 
                civic friendship, examining how the art of rhetoric can be used 
                to those ends. Political rhetoric also figured in Allen's paper 
                for a June conference on "The Moral Authority of Nature," held 
                at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Looking 
                at bees and beehives and their persistence as a symbol for the 
                model political community, she focused on Bernard Mandeville's 
                Fable of the Bees: or Private Vices, Publick Benefits, 
                asking, "Why is the bee such a fixed trope in the landscape? What 
                use is it?" Published in 1714, Mandeville's fable, she explains, 
                had to work "to assimilate the new natural information-that a 
                hive was ruled by a queen, not a king, for example-with existing 
                assumptions about gender and governance."
              In 
                addition to writing and to teaching Greek in fast motion ("It's 
                an extraordinary feat of memorization," she says, "for kids who 
                really like a challenge"), Allen is working with a group of graduate 
                students from several disciplines to edit a short video documentary. 
                Using footage from a friend's larger documentary project, Allen 
                and the students have focused on four women poets and novelist 
                who write about love and memory as they relate to Iranian self 
                understanding and social memory. "One of the those women," she 
                says, "has just been put in prison, so it's plain that their writings 
                are having a political impact."
              Before 
                the documentary makes its debut at the Humanities Open House this 
                fall, Allen says, "We need to finalize the version and record 
                it-the script's multivoiced and we'll do the voices ourselves." 
                She smiles. "It's very much a learning process for us.
              
              Steven 
                Kaplan, GSB
                A towering Babel of e-business plans looms on Steven Kaplan's 
                credenza. The other focal points in his decidedly utilitarian 
                Rosenwald 425 office are silver-framed black-and-white photographs 
                of his two young sons and a collection of coffee cups, tumblers, 
                and mugs in various states of use.
              Kaplan, the Neubauer Family professor in entrepreneurship 
                and finance at the GSB, explains that many of the piled-high proposals 
                are from former students trying to get Internet ventures off the 
                ground. Fueled by seemingly constant supplies of caffeine, he 
                is spending a part of his summer working his way through the proposals-a 
                process, he says, that "brings together my research, teaching, 
                and outside interests."
              
                 
                  |  | 
                 
                  | Steve 
                    Kaplan, GSB | 
              
              Although he has the summer off from teaching, he's 
                pulling together the course outline for his fall quarter course, 
                Entrepreneurial Finance and Private Equity, which he'll offer 
                in both the full-time and evening MBA program. He's also writing 
                three papers, two with colleagues at Chicago and one with an economist 
                from MIT. All are on questions that he calls "interesting to academics 
                and to the real world too."
              Take for example, a paper for an upcoming conference 
                sponsored by the National Board of Economic Research. Written 
                with Luis Garicano, AM'95, PhD'98, an assistant professor in economics 
                and strategy, the paper is "the first academic attempt to measure 
                the costs and benefits of using the Internet for business-to-business 
                transactions." The data for the study, he says, comes from companies 
                that former students have started: "Everything's related," he 
                grins.
              With Per Stromberg, another GSB colleague, Kaplan 
                is at work on a paper that asks, What do venture capitalists do? 
                "In finance and economics, there's a lot of theory about how an 
                investor decides to invest in a company or a product," he explains, 
                "but very little hard data about the environment in which those 
                decisions are made." Kaplan and Stromberg went to a dozen or so 
                venture capitalists and asked for that data: the business plans 
                from the corporations seeking investments, the investors' analysis 
                of the plans, and the contracts outlining the terms of investment. 
                Now that data-some neatly filed in sturdy brown boxes, some stacked 
                in loose piles awaiting review-fills several shelves in Kaplan's 
                office. Their analysis of how investors analyze and make investments 
                should be of interest to economists and start-ups alike.
              For the Journal of Economic Perspectives, 
                Kaplan and MIT economist Bengt Holmstrom are completing a survey 
                of corporate governance and mergers in the 1990s. Kaplan stops 
                to check a deadline on his computer screen, grimaces slightly, 
                continues outlining the paper: "The LBOs and hostile takeovers 
                of the '80s went way down in the 1990s. We're looking at why the 
                mechanisms for merger changed."
              Then back to the ever-growing tower. The good news, 
                for Kaplan as well as the companies who send him their plans: 
                "I can tell pretty quickly," he allows, "which ones are going 
                to work."
               
 