Chicago: 
                Campus of the Big Ideas
                >> The 
                launch of The Chicago Initiative-the University's five-year, $2 
                billion fund-raising effort-was marked by an April 12 event that 
                focused on Chicago's intellectual initiatives.
                
              
              
                
                  | 7 | Why 
                    do we dig up the past? | 
              
              "We 
                dig up the past because we're human," quipped Paul Sereno, 
                professor in organismal biology & anatomy. "We're curious 
                about where we came from and where we're going, what's possible, 
                what could have been, what could be. No other living thing can 
                think about the past. It's what makes us human."
              
              While 
                Sereno digs for bones of dinosaurs that, long before humans came 
                along, "clamored around" the swamps in what is now the 
                Sahara Desert, his fellow panelists dig to learn more about our 
                species. 
              
                 
                  |  | 
                 
                  |  
                      Michael Dietler digs up the past as an "antidote to 
                      historic myopia." | 
              
              The 
                earliest seeds of urban civilization have lured McGuire Gibson, 
                AM'64, PhD'68, professor in Mesopotamian archaeology, to northeastern 
                Syria and a dig at Tell Hamoukar. There he studies "the way 
                people stopped being hunters and gatherers, stopped living in 
                caves, and how civilizations came about." Among the remains 
                of a mud-brick city wall and a large two-story building with institutional-sized 
                ovens, he has assembled evidence challenging the view that urban 
                civilization began circa 3500-3100 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state 
                of Uruk in modern-day southern Iraq and then spread through the 
                ancient Near East. Instead, he argues, urban activity was under 
                way in northeastern Syria at about the same time-or even earlier, 
                between 4000 and 3700 B.C. 
              
              As 
                the fascinated murmurs elicited by Gibson receded, Michael Dietler 
                asked the group to put on their critical-thinking caps and consider 
                momentarily "the good, the bad, and the ugly"-that is, 
                the human-motives of archaeology. Dietler, associate professor 
                in anthropology, studies the Celtic speaking peoples of Iron Age 
                Europe, digging at the site of Lattes, near Montpellier in the 
                Languedoc region of France. "Archaeologists have too often 
                been the weapons of identity politics," he said, citing not 
                only the notorious digs of Nazi-financed archaeologists but also 
                France's own rising nationalism and the zeal to make national 
                heroes of the native Gauls who fought the colonizing Romans. "I 
                can't help but wonder," he said, "what layers were thrown 
                aside, what layers were left undug" to validate a national 
                identity.
              
              Despite 
                the bad and ugly, Dietler said he digs for the good: because "archaeology 
                is the only antidote to historic myopia." By the early 20th 
                century "half the surface of the earth's continents were 
                under colonial dominance." Dietler digs to learn more about 
                colonialism, particularly precapitalist colonial encounters. In 
                his material studies of early Roman colonies in France, he has 
                found among the objects, art, and self-representations made by 
                the Celts "the only means to restore a voice to those who 
                were written out of history."
              
              As 
                for the "where we're going" aspect of digging up the 
                past, Susan Kidwell, professor in geophysical sciences, hopes 
                to find some answers. Describing herself as an earth-sciences 
                historiographer, she studies the "recent" fossil record 
                (10,000-100,000 years ago) to judge its completeness and its skew, 
                working to understand the resilience of the biosphere. Changes 
                in climate, tectonic activity, ocean circulation, and mass extinctions 
                are "huge natural experiments run by nature," she explained. 
                "From them we can learn what determines resilience and what 
                precedes failure." Her recent collaborations with ecologists 
                and conservation biologists compare the current environment with 
                the past, in an effort to determine how much present-day change 
                is part of natural cycles and how much is caused by humans. She 
                doesn't have firm answers yet-except to say that humans have been 
                altering the environment for a very long time.
              
              Quoting 
                the novelist Russell Hoban, Kidwell summed up the human desire 
                to dig in this way: "If the past cannot teach the present..., 
                then history need not have bothered to go on, and the world has 
                wasted a great deal of time."
                 -S.A.S.
                
              
              1. 
                In 
                the beginning: what do our origins tell us about ourselves?
              2. 
                   
                Homo sapiens: are 
                we really rational creatures?
              3. 
                   
                Integrating the 
                physical and biological sciences: what lies ahead?
              4. 
                 Money, 
                services, or laws: how do we improve lives?
              5. 
                   
                Clones, genes, and 
                stem cells: can we find the path to the greatest good?
              6. 
                  
                 How will technology change 
                the way we work and live?
              7. 
                   
                Why do we dig up 
                the past?
              8. 
                   
                Art for art's sake?
              9. 
                   
                In the realm of 
                the senses: how do we understand what we see, hear, feel, smell, 
                and taste?
              10. 
                   
                Can we protect 
                civil liberties in wartime?
              
              CHICAGO 
                INITIATIVE GOALS
                
              
              
                 
              
              