| GlimpsesPhotograph by Dan Dry
 William F. Browder, 
               AB’85, is chief executive 
              officer of Hermitage Capital Management. In April 1996 the Stanford 
              MBA arrived in Moscow with “briefcase, cell phone, not a word 
              of Russian,” and $25 million from international banker Edmund 
              J. Safra. Today his firm’s Russia-dedicated public equity 
              fund has $1.4 billion in assets, and Browder has a reputation as 
              a corporate gadfly, going to bat for minority shareholders against 
              the oligarchs who control Russia’s giant utilities. As Browder 
              argues, it’s the American way. Genealogy of a career decision: 
              I come from this unusual family—my grandfather [Earl R. Browder] 
              was the general secretary of the American Communist Party, my grandmother’s 
              Russian, and my father [Felix E. Browder, chair of Chicago’s 
              math department in the 1970s and ’80s] and uncles were born 
              in Moscow. When I earned my MBA, I decided I needed to find a job 
              that was personally relevant. That was in 1989, the year the Berlin 
              Wall came down, and I ended up becoming the first employee of the 
              Boston Consulting Group’s Eastern European practice area, 
              working out of the London office.  From BCG bus-factory consultant 
              to investor: I asked my translator what all the advertisements 
              in the Polish newspapers were about. He explained that this one 
              was for the privatization of a textile factory, for a bank, for 
              a rubber company. I asked him to help me do the math, and it turned 
              out that the evaluations on the companies were about half their 
              previous year’s profits. No matter how many classes I’d 
              overlooked in business school, I understood that was a good deal. 
              So I took my life savings—about $4,000—and went down 
              to the post office and signed over my traveler’s checks to 
              buy shares in these first Polish privatizations. At that point I 
              decided that my vocation had to be investing in privatization in 
              Eastern Europe. Riding the Russian roller 
              coaster to $1.5 billion by 1998 and down again: The storm 
              clouds began to gather when the Asian currency started to devalue. 
              My biggest career mistake was making a very articulate argument 
              about how Asian currencies weren’t going to affect Russian 
              stocks. My analysis said that there were no investment or trading 
              links between Russia and Asia; therefore Russian stocks should be 
              immune from Asian currency prices. I didn’t realize that the 
              world is one big sea of liquidity, and if people lose money in one 
              part of the world, they also sell securities in another part. That 
              was a very costly lesson—we went down roughly 90 percent from 
              peak to trough. How the gadfly learned 
              to bite: When capital markets began to shut down, the oligarchs 
              had no incentive not to misbehave—embezzlement, asset stripping, 
              transfer pricing, share dilutions. To protect my economic interests 
              I had to fight. My first fight was with Vladimir Potanin, who owned 
              96 percent of [the oil holding company] Sidanco; I owned 2 percent, 
              and friends of mine owned 2 percent. Potanin organized a share dilution 
              to triple the number of outstanding shares, with the new shares 
              sold only to his group, at a 97 percent discount. Essentially, he 
              was going to steal two-thirds of our stock. We went to war.  Perhaps we won because I played by the American 
              set of rules, using levers that any corporate-governance activist 
              would use: the press, written laws, the regulators, and peer pressure. 
              Since then we’ve been involved in nine major corporate-governance 
              disputes. We invest in companies where we find things that are wrong 
              and find levers that we can pull that make those wrong things stop. 
              That creates an increase of value greater than one can get by being 
              a passive shareholder. And a nice by-product is that we can also 
              make Russia a better place. Why he shares his grandfather’s activist 
              streak: It’s fighting the big 
              guys for the little guys. It may not seem like we’re little 
              guys as big investors but we’re the ones fighting for the 
              minority shareholders. If there are people with advantages who are 
              ruining things for other people, that’s what I’m working 
              on. It’s a genetic thing. There’s a certain passion 
              in being an activist, and it’s just as much my passion as 
              his. |  |