Bursting at the seams
By Amy M. Braverman
Photography by Dan Dry
That’s how Chicago arts faculty describe
their programs. A new Center for Creative and Performing Arts could
alleviate the overflow—and develop a model for nurturing the
arts at a research institution.
Imagine an MFA student sharing a paint shop with
undergraduates designing theater sets, showing them how to create
a more realistic backdrop. Or, in a shared computer lab, musicians
composing a score for a film student’s short movie. Or sculptors
and photographers brainstorming ideas for an installation exhibit
over coffee. Such collaboration pervades the University’s
vision for a new Center for the Creative and Performing Arts, where
Chicago’s interdisciplinary thinking can infuse artistic endeavors.
The facility, planned for five to ten years from
now, or whenever the University raises the $53 million (in 2003
dollars) needed for Phase I of the project, is still in the conceptual
stage. But the idea of a center that encourages collaboration, where
the arts are not only housed under the same roof but also share
rooms—a carpentry, metal, paint, and costume shop; a lounge;
a café; exhibit and theater space—has been germinating
for several years. In fall 2000 then-provost Geoffrey Stone, JD’71,
convened a faculty committee and an advisory group of faculty, students,
and staff to study the arts on campus. Stone, the Harry Kalven Jr.
distinguished service professor in the Law School and the College,
began the project, he says, because of growing faculty and student
interest in arts activities as well as “the absence of a clear
sense of how these activities fit into the University’s larger
mission.”
A year later the committee released its recommendations,
calling for both an Arts Planning Council, which formed shortly
thereafter, and a new facility for “visual arts, music practice
and rehearsal, and theater and performance.” The interdisciplinary
focus, “the idea of bringing together people in the arts,
that the whole would be bigger than the sum of its parts,”
Stone says, emerged early on. Other colleges and universities—Chicago’s
arts center steering committee visited Grinnell, Valparaiso, and
Ohio State—have modern multidisciplinary arts facilities,
where departments share the same building but have their own wings
or sections. Chicago’s more cohesive plan (New York architects
Hardy Holzman Pfeiffer Associates have designed a 182,000-square-foot
conceptual blueprint, but bids for an actual building have not yet
been placed), to provide departments their own areas plus some common
space, appears to be a novel approach.
The center’s steering committee particularly
favors the plan’s “arts alley” featuring a café,
lounge, and perhaps a glass roof. In such an area “students
and faculty could gather informally,” an April 2004 report
says, “and serendipitous transfers of ideas and insights could
occur.” A shared shop would both reduce the square footage
needed for the center and foster previously difficult or unimagined
alliances. “Smart” classrooms, containing high-tech
audio-visual and computer equipment, would double as rehearsal space.
Seminar and lecture/screening rooms, a computer lab, and shared
faculty offices would be used by multiple departments. As Humanities
Dean Janel Mueller, who cochairs the steering committee with Associate
Provost Mary Harvey, PhD’87, puts it, “We can create
something both defining of the University of Chicago and on the
forefront of arts development.” Mueller’s personal inspiration
for an “arts village,” she says, comes from painter
Lyonel Feininger (1871–1956), whose cubist townscapes of interwoven
buildings and pedestrians evoke “a sense of a cluster of spaces,
almost organically fused together,” portraying “solidity,
intimacy, connectedness.”
The time for such a village seems right: an integrated
approach echoes the current art trend of mixing media. “Opera
used to be where a number of the arts converged,” notes Mueller,
the William Rainey Harper distinguished service professor in the
College and a professor of English language & literature. Now,
she says, the convergence occurs in installation and performance
pieces. Committee member William Michel, AB’92, the University’s
assistant vice president for student life, agrees. “The really
interesting art happening today and into the future,” says
Michel, who formerly directed University Theater, “is art
that encompasses many different media at the same time, whether
that be dance and film or theater and visual arts.”
|
Photographer
Laura Letinsky (far left), Film Studies Center assistant director
Julia Gibbs, MFA student Ben King, and first-year theater
costumer Catharine Kollros demonstrate their crafts as currently
practiced at Chicago.
|
Mixing media at Chicago, however, requires significant
effort. The disciplines are not only separated from each other but
also divided among themselves. Music, for one, lives mostly at Fulton
Hall, which holds professors’ offices, student practice rooms,
and a 100-seat concert hall. But performances for larger audiences
or needing a bigger stage take place across the quads at the 1,000-seat
Mandel Hall. University Theater (UT), meanwhile, is stationed on
the Reynolds Club’s third floor, but students rehearse in
Cobb and Bartlett, and UT’s shop for constructing sets and
costumes is in a former print shop at 50th Street and Cornell Avenue.
The Film Studies Center, where film research and screenings take
place, has Cobb Hall quarters, but most of the Committee on Cinema
and Media Studies faculty have offices in Gates-Blake. Meanwhile,
the Committee on the Visual Arts (COVA) resides at Midway Studios,
in the campus’s most southwest corner.
Many of those scattered facilities need major renovations and can’t
accommodate the growing number of arts-inclined students and faculty.
As the College bulges to an estimated 4,500 students by 2004–05,
more undergraduates will expect to study or practice sculpture,
painting, music, theater, and film. This year 44 registered student
organizations focused on fine arts, and another 11 put out publications.
In the visual arts, some 350 undergraduates take Visual Language
1 and 2, making it the most popular Core Humanities sequence offered,
and COVA must double up on studio space for its 25 annual College
concentrators and 20 graduate students, even partitioning off part
of Midway Studios’ painting classroom for additional studios.
|
The
project calls for renovating Midway Studios’ landmark
portions and building an adjacent structure for other campus
arts.
Click here
for full view. |
Midway Studios itself, though beloved for its
sense of character and historical importance, is “falling
apart,” says assistant professor Alison Ruttan, who teaches
painting, drawing, and digital media. Once a communal haven for
sculptor Lorado Taft, where he and other stone carvers lived, worked,
ate, and partied, the building was always makeshift. In the 1920s
and ’30s Taft had a carriage house, a three-story brick house,
and a half-dozen other buildings literally picked up, dropped, and
attached to each other at Ingleside Avenue and 60th Street. The
resulting maze of white paint–flecked bedrooms-turned-studios,
staircases to nowhere, and upstairs balconies that once faced outdoors
was designated a national landmark in 1966. As campus arts grew,
in 1977 the Women’s Board donated funds for a 2,150-square-foot
addition, a two-story painting studio. In 2000–01 the University
spent $300,000 to drive out the rats, mend the leaking roof, and
secure the doors to the outside. The next year an ID-card-swipe
entry was installed; before that students working after-hours had
to call University police from a corner emergency phone to unlock
the door. More recently new studios, a new classroom, and three
editing and computer labs were added.
Despite the improvements, the original structure—never
meant for photography and painting, much less for today’s
media and digital arts—needs a new roof, better air circulation,
and updated technology. While Midway Studios has one black-and-white
graduate-student darkroom, the color and undergraduate darkrooms
are in Cobb, where the constant spilling of processing fluids has
crumbled and softened the tile floors, and the few enlargers don’t
meet the demand. By building a new arts center adjacent to Midway
Studios’ landmark portions (the newer sections would be torn
down), the University would be able to fix such problems, and a
modern structure would accommodate COVA and other campus arts.
Those other departments need updating too. More
than 650 students take part in University Theater each year, producing
35 shows. Undergraduates can now concentrate in theater and performance
studies, and the 30 related courses continue to fill up quickly.
Student productions, held in either the 100–150-seat first-floor
Reynolds Club theater or the 137-seat third-floor space, “sell
out in ten minutes,” says UT director Heidi Coleman, “because
the audience is so small.” Converted from a lounge to a black-box
theater, the first-floor space has a low ceiling, preventing students
from experimenting with lighting angles. Directors and designers
should begin with a blank slate—“like a lab,”
Coleman says—to “decide the actor-audience relationship,
think about space and design, lighting, set, costumes.” To
rehearse, students invade more than ten Cobb Hall classrooms every
night, spending a half hour dragging chairs and desks out of the
way (and later replacing them), performing in space one-third the
usual stage size. The Cornell Avenue building that holds the shop,
meanwhile, will be leased to the Hyde Park Arts Center, likely by
summer 2005, and the University is still working to find a large
enough interim replacement.
In Fulton Hall the 100 music graduate students,
550 ensemble players, and many extracurricular vocal groups, bands,
and chamber players need more practice rooms. At 3:15 on an April
Thursday afternoon, some students play fluid classical piano, others
practice a Broadway duet on scarred uprights or baby grands. Six
of the ten available rooms are filled. “Most universities
would have 30 to 40” such spaces, says Barbara Schubert, X’79,
senior lecturer in music and director of performer programs. The
rooms, meanwhile, aren’t meant to store instruments. Instead
of the 68 degrees and high humidity ideal for piano maintenance,
the building’s steam heat dries out the instruments, and when
it gets too hot players open the windows, causing destructive temperature
changes. “We’ve replaced a lot of our pianos”
earlier than should be necessary, Schubert says. Although the Fulton
Recital Hall holds 100 seats and Mandel Hall holds 1,000, the ideal
setting for many student performances, she says, is 300–350
seats. The Fulton stage and audience are inadequate for chamber
music and jazz X-tets, but in Mandel Hall—which has no air
conditioning—players and audience get swallowed by the huge
space.
Film too needs better facilities and more space.
About 30 undergraduates and 30 graduate students earn degrees from
the Committee on Cinema and Media Studies (CMS) each year. As the
committee and the Film Studies Center hold more public events, community
members can’t easily find the center on Cobb’s third
floor, and, when they do, the 125–150-seat theater is often
SRO. During a recent Andy Warhol film series, including a rare double-screen
projection of Chelsea Girls, “I had to turn people away,”
says Julia Gibbs, assistant director of the Film Studies Center.
About twice as many people showed up as the theater could fit. Film
faculty, meanwhile, prefer not to screen videos or DVDs but films—as
“they were meant to be shown,” Gibbs notes—but
the center has no appropriate place to store sensitive negatives.
A cold, dry vault is needed for teaching films and to begin an archival
collection. The current vault in Cobb has already run out of shelf
space, and humidity easily seeps in. Last July 4, says CMS chair
James Lastra, campus construction crews accidentally turned a valve
that heated the vault to over 100 degrees—double the ideal
50.
|
An
old film projector and MFA student David Wolf’s (AB’00)
cramped studio show the need for arts updates. Second-year
biology undergrad Meghan Mott (right) measures a flat in a
scene-painting class. |
The new center won’t fulfill everyone’s
wish list. Sculptor Herbert George’s undergraduate students,
strewn about Midway Studios’ grassy courtyard a few minutes
before class one April afternoon, sporting protective goggles as
they pound hammers and chisels into gray alabaster or limestone,
tick off Chicago’s material-arts deficiencies. “How
about glass blowing? Or jewelry making? Or metal working?”
suggests second-year Kathryn Tabb, garnering “yeah”s
and nods from the others. While the first two requests didn’t
make the new plans, metal-working tools did. “And where’s
the pottery wheel? I’ve heard Harvard has pottery wheels in
the dorms.” Ceramics isn’t on the list—it’s
one of those tough choices the committee had to make, Michel says.
But he hopes to find a pottery wheel elsewhere on campus for student
use. (For the record, Harvard’s Quincy House and possibly
another dorm, according to housing officials there, do offer pottery
wheels.)
Other departments see both pluses and minuses
in the center’s blueprint. While Schubert is pleased that
the plans contain about 20 temperature-controlled music practice
rooms and rehearsal and office space, she worries that a 350-seat
theater isn’t planned until Phase II of the project—a
$33.5 million (in 2003 dollars) addition after Phase I is completed—and
that instead of scrambling between two campus locations, she’ll
now travel among three. Music, she frets, isn’t a big enough
focus. “If the idea is that you’re bumping into people
over coffee,” she says, “if you’re not there,
you’re not part of the collaboration.” But overall,
she stresses, the plan “presents a good step forward”
for campus arts.
Coleman is thrilled to see two correctly built
theaters (one seating 100, another seating 150) with appropriate
backstage and green rooms, more rehearsal and classroom space, scenery
and costume storage, and a new shop. But she too now has one more
work location, and she worries about sharing shop space. Undergraduates
building a set “play loud music, yell back and forth,”
she says. “The way a painter uses an open tool space is different
than the way theater uses it,” George agrees, and a graduate-student
sculptor might not prefer such a chaotic environment. Film will
still be based in Cobb, but, Gibbs says, “We got what we asked
for”: more screening space in a better public location and
the temperature-controlled film vault. Visual arts, meanwhile, will
get more studio, sculpture, painting, printmaking, photography,
projection, and exhibit space.
Decisions about what the new center would hold—and what it
wouldn’t—were often a choice of quality over quantity,
explains Lastra, who’s on the center’s advisory committee.
“We went to a more expensive square-foot model” instead
of a larger one with cheaper materials, he says. Rather than anticipate
every future arts need, Michel adds, the building is meant to meet
the currently swelling interest. The Reynolds Club, Bartlett rehearsal
space, and Cobb Hall will still be used for theater. Mandel and
Fulton will remain music venues, and the current music practice
rooms will still be needed. Films will be shown in Cobb and the
Max Palevsky theater. The new facility will create a “focal
point,” he says, “but it’s not a center where
all of the arts happen only there. One of the nice things about
this campus is that the arts permeate everywhere.” As for
the shared spaces, Michel admits, some specifics need to be worked
out. But though there’s one main shop, he points out, the
plans call for “defined but permeable” walls or dividers
to section off the various activities.
A main point of the center, committee members
say, is to boost the spectrum, caché, and knowledge of Chicago’s
arts scene. Rather than promote “the traditional idea that
arts are for recreational purposes or for self-exploration beyond
one’s main studies,” Mueller says, Chicago should foster
art as an end in itself. “Learning the thought process for
painting and drawing and theater and music can enrich your life
outside of your studies,” Michel adds, “but also provide
you with a full skill set that complements what happens in the science
labs and math class.” The heightened attention on the arts
will benefit students. “The work that students do here is
incredible,” Coleman says, “but they don’t know
that. They’re proud and very serious, but they don’t
know that it matters to anyone outside of here. Having a space designed
for them shows respect for their work and encourages them to go
further. They’re starting to realize that the University cares
about the arts as much as they do, that it’s legitimate.”
Adhering to a two-year-old University policy,
construction on the Center for Creative and Performing Arts won’t
begin until 85 percent of the funds are raised. But once built,
like Midway Studios it will be a place for creativity, where spilling
paint is OK, where students perform in the hallways. “It’s
not pristine,” Michel says. “The energy of this building
should come from people sitting in the lobby or carrying flats [for
theater sets] through the hallway.”
Crouching in Midway Studios’ courtyard,
chipping away at his alabaster sculpture, first-year biology major
Kyle Guzik has grand visions for Chicago’s arts scene. “This
college has the finest biology, math, and economics programs in
the world,” he says. “The arts program could be just
as good. I’d like to see more of an arts community.”
On that, there’s universal agreement.
|
|