IMAGE:  April 2003
 
LINK:  Also in every issue
Editor's Notes  
Letters  
From the President  
Chicagophile  
 
LINK:  Features
Revolution from Within  
Classified Knowledge  
Lake Effect  
Just Cause  

Tournament of Roses

 

LINK:  Class Notes
Alumni News  
Alumni Works  
C.Vitae  
Deaths  

LINK:  Campus News
Chicago Journal  
University News  
Uchicago.edu e-bulletin  

LINK:  Research
Investigations  
Citations  
U of C Research Organizations  
 
GRAPHIC:  University of Chicago Magazine
 
 
JUNE 2003
Volume 95, Issue 5
 

GRAPHIC:  Also in every issueLetters

It might sound ridiculous, but “potty parity” is an issue…

High cost of athletic support?
After reading Carrie Golus’s “College Report” in the February/2003 issue, I was so angry that I put the magazine down, waited a week, and then re-read the piece again just to make sure I had read it correctly. The mere notion that academic standards at the University of Chicago are not relaxed for some prospective athletes is just silly. There are many examples of acceptable students admitted to the University who happen to participate in the school’s athletic programs. There are even shining examples of student-athletes such as Brad Henderson [AB’01, AM’01] and Erin Bohula [AB’99]. The sad truth, however, is that there is a non-insignificant percentage of athletes admitted to the University who have no business being there. It is only because many of these athletes go on to concentrate in the University’s less stringent areas of study and belong to the same extracurricular student organizations, which lend themselves to “creative collaboration,” that they are able to keep pace with the academic rigors of the College.

Perhaps a better idea for a story would be to examine if athletics at the University of Chicago has any context at all. Every year the University spends millions of dollars on athletics (not including the millions currently being spent on the Ratner Center), and I have a hard time determining why. There is only a small percentage of the student body that participates in athletics (excluding intramural sports). No sport at the University gathers any kind of consistent support from the student body or the local community. Often times there are only a smattering of fans for a given competition.

So what does athletics at the University of Chicago add? Does it improve the University’s rank in polls, or the overall perception of the University? I believe that the University could find a more productive and efficient way of spending this money in order to accomplish those goals. It would appear that the University has an athletic program simply for the sake of having one, and only at the expense of the greater student body.

Justin Skiftenes, AB’00
Chicago


The University of Chicago Magazine welcomes letters on its contents or on topics related to the University. Letters for publication must be signed and may be edited for space and clarity. To ensure a range of views and voices, we implore readers to keep correspondence to 300 words or less. Write:

Editor, University of Chicago Magazine,
5801 S. Ellis Avenue
Chicago, IL 60637

E-mail: uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu

 

 


Google
Search WWW Search magazine.uchicago.edu

Contact Advertising About the Magazine Alumni UChicago Views Archives
uchicago 2003 The University of Chicago Magazine 5801 South Ellis Ave., Chicago, IL 60637
phone: 773/702-2163 fax: 773/702-0495 uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu