Investigations
When marriage raises
AIDS rates
Although many parents in sub-Saharan
Africa believe early marriage will shield their adolescent
daughters from the region’s HIV/AIDS epidemic, in
fact the opposite may be true, according to research by
Shelley Clark, assistant professor in the Harris Graduate
School of Public Policy Studies.
As a demographer with the nonprofit Population
Council before coming to Chicago in 2001, Clark studied
adolescent girls in South Africa. Much of the New York–based
council’s work had demonstrated that marriage posed
disadvantages for sub-Saharan 15- to 19-year-old girls—such
as stunted educational opportunities, restricted access
to public spaces (it’s considered inappropriate for
married women to appear unescorted in public), and limited
control over their reproductive health. Even so, Clark,
like many other researchers, thought it an “outrageous
claim” when a colleague suggested that, in the context
of high HIV rates, “early marriage was tantamount
to a death sentence for young girls.”
“The presumption that sex within
marriage is good and safe, and that it is premarital sex
that is bad, risky, and dangerous,” she explains,
“runs deep.” Yet she found research on girls
in Kisumu, Kenya, and Ndola, Zambia—countries in which,
respectively, about 40 percent and 47 percent of sexually
active 15- to 19-year-old girls are married—suggesting
that her colleague’s claim was valid. The 1997–98
study showed that 32.9 percent of married girls in Kisumu
were HIV-positive, compared to 22.3 percent of unmarried
girls. In Ndola the ratio was 27.3 percent to 16.5 percent.
The likelihood of infection, therefore, was 48 percent higher
for married girls in Kisumu and 65 percent higher in Ndola.
Those figures “really got me hooked,” Clark
says, “since this result was left largely unexplained.”
She began her research, part of a larger
Population Council project, to look for an explanation.
Using the Kisumu-Ndola study and Demographic and Health
Survey data (funded by the U.S. Agency for International
Development), she found three main causes. First, marriage
effectively ends condom use, both because of the desire
for children and because condoms are seen as a sign of distrust.
Second, sexual frequency rises dramatically with marriage.
And third, the husbands of married girls are generally older
and more sexually experienced—and therefore more likely
to be infected—than the boyfriends of single girls.
“These girls typically marry a
man five to ten years older than themselves,” Clark
says. Husbands often are older in part because it takes
men years to save for the traditional “bride price”
given to a girl’s family. “He will have had
more sexual partners, including prior wives, since many
of these marriages are polygamous,” Clark says.
Given HIV’s low transmission rate
(women have a 0.3 percent chance of infection for every
act of unprotected sex with an infected partner, while men
have a 0.1 percent chance), Clark says, the risk posed by
frequent, unprotected intercourse—far more prevalent
among married girls—is a more critical determinant
in the likelihood of infection than is the number of one’s
sexual partners. This helps to account for the unexpected
finding that even single girls with multiple partners are
at less risk than their married counterparts.
Ironically, Clark says, “Parents
told us they really wanted their daughters to marry early
to protect them from HIV.” At the same time “public
and private policymakers actively encouraged virginity before
marriage and promoted marriage as the best option to avoid
disease,” she says. “Most researchers saw premarital
sex as the problem and marriage as the solution.”
She hopes her study can convince parents,
policymakers, and researchers that marriage does not offer
the best protection against contracting a sexually transmitted
disease. But in sub-Saharan Africa, where such diseases
are pandemic, attitudes about marriage and sex are entrenched.
“Unfortunately, many individuals in these countries
appear to be fatalistic about contracting HIV,” she
says. “We need to develop policies that will raise
awareness and change prevailing beliefs in a way that will
genuinely address the problem.”
Clark’s next step, in fact, is
working with the Population Council and the World Health
Organization to “figure out what the policy messages
should be for married girls.”
— Amy Braverman